Monday, June 19, 2006

Cooking Up A Good Idea

Have you been waiting to remodel your old avocado and gold 70s kitchen until 1) the retro craze passed into merciful oblivion, or 2) someone finally came up with something really new in a stove design? If the answer is #1, I can't help you, and not to be too harsh on you here, but I actually have my doubts that anyone can. I can only recommend that when you wake up every morning you repeat to yourself, "I will not be a slave to fads today. I will not be a slave to fads today." This may have no effect at all, but at least you will be starting your day sensibly, no matter what the rest of it holds. If the answer is #2, the folks at Yanko Design may have just the thing to jump-start your kitchen's entry into the twenty-first century--the Simmer Stove.

The new stove concept is based on the notion that existing stove design is unsafe and lacking in energy efficiency. In myriad kitchens throughout the world plentiful pots possessing piping hot potions perch precariously atop open elements. (I have now reached my alliteration quota for the day.) The new design involves lowering the cooking element into the counter, so that the top of the pot is flush with the counter-top. This makes it impossible to knock a pot off the stove, and when the pot is removed, the element is still tucked safely below the surface where hands can't accidentally land on a hot burner. It also makes for much more efficient cooking, since the pot inserted into the opening encloses and traps the heat, a nice feature on a hot day, (It would at least slow the process of heating up your kitchen down a good deal.) Another nice feature is that the elements are separate units, so the kitchen design can be very flexible. If you want two burners on one side of the room, and three more on another, you can make it so. Cool.

I do have a question or two about the stove's functionality. The blurb I read wasn't long, just a brief description, and a couple of photos to illustrate the idea. I get the concept of a pot of soup, or boiling potatoes, or what have you, sitting below the surface, for all the above mentioned reasons. I'm not as clear on how that would work, however, for frying things, or making omelets, for example. When I'm frying splattery chicken, I don't particularly want to reach my hand inside a several inches deep pot to turn the pieces over. Call me crazy. I assume there must be some sort of adapter for shallower pans where they're required. Perhaps you simply use the shallow pan and wait longer for the heat to rise up and reach the bottom of it. That sounds simple enough, if a bit irritating. I also assume there must be some possibility of pulling out portions of each unit for cleaning, since trying to reach down into a burner well just out of one's easy reach could be a pain in various places. I'm sure these are things the designers have all figured out already; I just didn't see the answers spelled out in writing, and would need them before plunking my money down. Otherwise, I think below-the-counter is a great idea. The main problem being that my husband and I did not wait to get rid of our 70's kitchen, ditching it at the first opportunity, in fact, so we'll have to wait a while before the next remodel. I'm going to be keeping this idea on the back burner though--so to speak.

Hat tip: Futurismic

6 comments:

  1. What is wrong with Avocado and Gold?? People should be allowed their freedom to choose colors they like without fear of rebuke from the color police. Didn't you post on "intolerance"??

    ReplyDelete
  2. What is wrong with Avocado and Gold?? People should be allowed their freedom to choose colors they like without fear of rebuke from the color police. Didn't you post on "intolerance"??

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing. Avocados are delicious, and gold makes lovely jewelry. They simply both have their proper place in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Apparently 'Bubba' is unaware (in spite of being married to her) that Kat DOES have the authority to enforce all color decisions on the part of the American Populace.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not enforce. I merely advise, and pray.

    ReplyDelete
  6. WE USED TO HAVE SUNKEN COOKER POTS IN OUR STOVES WHEN I WAS YOUNG,AND I JUST LOVED THEM FOR COOKING BEANS, STEWS, OR ANYTHING THAT TOOK TIME TO PREPARE. WNEN I BABY-SAT WHILE I WAS PREGNANT WITH MY DAUGHTER DORIE I MADE THE BEST VEAL BIRDS OUT OF AN OLD TOUGH BULL BY CUTTING AN OPENING IN THE STEAK AND STUFFING IT WITH DRESSING. THESE WERE COOKED IN A SUNKEN COOKER POT AND NEVER FAILED TO TURN OUT SCRUMPTIOUSLY GOOD. I SUPPOSE THE SINGLE UNIT SLOW COOKER POT COULD BE USED BUT IT IS SUCH A PAIN IN THE NECK TO CLEAN, WHEREAS THE SUNKEN KETTLE COULD BE CLEANED LIKE ANY OTHER KETTLE WITHOUT HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS.

    ReplyDelete